I will be somewhat updating and reposting this from 2012 since the main-stream news have actually guaranteed extremely few individuals understand the detail associated with the “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought not to have now been arrested in the uk in the beginning while there is no situation, with no investigation that is genuine. Check this out and you also will understand why.
One other thing maybe maybe not commonly grasped can there be isn’t any JURY in a rape test in Sweden which is a SECRET TEST. Every one of the proof, all the witnesses, are heard in key. No public, no jury, no news. Really the only part that is public the charging and also the verdict. There was a judge as well as 2 advisers straight appointed by governmental events. And that means you never would get to comprehend exactly how clearly the full instance is a stitch-up. Unless you look at this.
You can find therefore numerous inconsistencies in Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. Nevertheless the key question which leaps out at me personally – and which strangely i’ve not seen asked anywhere else – is this:
Why did Anna Ardin maybe not alert Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood into the group that is swedish Assange for the shocking red cashmere sweater she had worn right in front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange was likely to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a pal who had been to locate Assange:
“He’s maybe not right here. He’s planned to own sex using the girl that is cashmere night, although not managed to get. Perhaps he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days early in the day, on 13 August, she was indeed intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she had been happy to decide to try (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s life that is entire. She ended up being additionally to mention that this attack included xhamsterlive mobile enforced sex that is unprotected she was concerned with HIV.
If Ardin actually thought that on 13 August Assange had forced unsafe sex she make no attempt to warn Sofia Wilen that Wilen was in danger of her life on her and this could have transmitted HIV, why did? And exactly why had been Ardin speaking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about any of it to buddies, without any obvious disapproval or discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information as well as had organised her enrollment for the press meeting. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.
Why don’t we fit that into a tremendously brief survey associated with the entire Ardin/Assange relationship.
11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for a press meeting organised with a branch associated with Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat for him in which to stay as she’s going to be away.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s got supper with Assange and they’ve got consensual intercourse, from the very first day’s conference. Ardin afterwards alleges this changed into attack by surreptitious mutilation for the condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to behave as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him in the dais at their press meeting. Assange fulfills Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to head to a party that is crayfish anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This make an effort to find a crayfish celebration fails, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early early morning. Another proposes to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick with me personally. ”
15 August Nevertheless during the party that is crayfish Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting in the open air at 02:00 and scarcely freezing utilizing the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, based on both their authorities testimonies, rest once more in the same bed that is single and continue doing therefore for the following day or two. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have sexual intercourse; Anna tells police they don’t. That Anna and Julian go together to, and leave together from, a dinner with the leadership of the Pirate Party evening. They again sleep within the bed that is same.
16 August: Julian would go to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin doesn’t alert her of prospective intimate attack. Another friend provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once more declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say she actually is focused on STD’s including HIV after unsafe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague on a single ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist police, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to just take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s unrecorded – in breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a declaration accusing Assange of rape. Wilen will not signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had sex that is unprotected her eight times formerly.
Some days later on: Ardin creates a broken condom towards the authorities as proof; but a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA it is apparently unused on it, and indeed.
No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s Ardin-arranged meeting with Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead to not grumble of a attack, but check into STDs. Wilen refused to signal the declaration alleging rape, that has been used by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s presence.
It is ordinary any particular one of a couple of things took place:
Ardin ended up being intimately assaulted with unsafe sex, but neglected to alert Wilen when she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, come in general general public and personal with him, work as his press assistant, and rest in identical sleep with him, refusing duplicated provides to allow for him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Ardin wanted intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” returned home early after providing him the utilization of her one sleep flat while she ended up being away. By her very own admission, she had sex that is consensual him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She talked about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and appears at the very least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after unsafe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning feminist friend, policewoman Irmeli Krans, in order to twist Wilen’s tale in to a sexual assault – very easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape legislation. Wilen declined to signal.
During the authorities place on 20 August, Wilen texted a pal at 14.25 “did not require to place any costs against JA nevertheless the authorities wished to get a handle on him. ”
At 17.26 she texted because I only wanted him to take a test” that she was “shocked when they arrested JA.
The evening that is next 22.22 she texted “it ended up being the authorities whom fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then made her very own tale of sexual attack. As numerous buddies knew she ended up being making love with Assange, she could maybe maybe maybe not claim non-consensual intercourse. Therefore she manufactured her tale to squeeze in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event regarding the condom that is torn. However the condom that is torn produced doesn’t have trace of Assange about it. It really is impractical to wear a condom rather than keep a DNA trace.
We have no trouble in stating that We securely think Ardin to become a liar. On her behalf tale to be real involves acceptance of behavior which can be, into the literal feeling, incredible.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that does not matter. Firstly, you’re never ever likely to see all this work detail. Rape studies in Sweden take place completely in key. There’s absolutely no jury, while the national federal government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by governmental events. The trial will be secret, and the next thing you will hear is that he is guilty and a rapist if Assange goes to Sweden, he will disappear into jail.
Next, needless to say, no matter evidence can be so poor, as simply to cry rape would be to tarnish a man’s reputation forever. Anna Ardin has recently succeeded in destroying a lot of the ongoing work and life of Assange. The main points for the whole tale being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line that it’s incorrect also to consider the data. If you should be perhaps not permitted to know whom the accuser is, how will you find out that she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro teams in Havana and Miami?
Finally, to those of good use idiots who declare that the best way to test these things is in court, I would personally state needless to say, you might be appropriate, we have to trust their state always, fit-ups never happen, so we should definitely condemn the disgraceful behavior of the whom campaigned for the Birmingham Six.